Unexpectedly, collective efficacy beliefs improved among consumers of conservative, but not liberal, news. We anticipated that political leaning of bystanders’ news sources would moderate effects of marches. In contrast, marches were ineffective in increasing perceptions of others’ engagement with concern about climate change. Results suggest that the marches were at least partially effective: bystanders’ (a) collective efficacy beliefs and (b) impressions of marchers improved after the march. Participants either completed a survey the day before the March for Science ( n = 302) or several days after the People’s Climate March, which occurred a week after the first march ( n = 285). #Collective action drivers#Here, we conduct a trend study to test the impacts of two back-to-back highly visible large-scale climate change related marches on bystanders, targeting psychological drivers of collective action: efficacy beliefs, perceptions of others’ climate change activism and concerns, impressions of marchers, and behavioral intentions. Political marches are one of the most public and vocal means of engaging in collective action and can potentially build social movements by increasing the likelihood that bystanders become engaged with the social movement. 2The Media School, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.1Psychology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.Swim 1 *, Nathaniel Geiger 2 and Michael L. These data provide strong support for the theory while pointing the way to a more complex and nuanced approach to collective action, uniting theories of pre-modern and modern states.Janet K. Rather, it subjects collective action theory to a methodologically rigorous evaluation using a systematic cross-cultural analysis of historical, ethnographic, and archaeological data drawn from a world-wide sample of societies. This book explores a collective action perspective on the formation of pre-modern states, but does not only promote a new mode of theoretical understanding. This theory addresses the dilemma faced by any group attempting to build a complex society, namely, that the rational and self-interested behavior of social actors may limit the potential for collective action and group solidarity. The authors propose that the rational choice theory of collective action, especially as it has been developed by political scientists, is a fruitful new direction for theory-building that can overcome these limitations. New methods and new discoveries have inspired anthropological archaeologists and other social scientists to rethink prevailing theories, which now seem excessively deterministic and unable to account for the role of human action in social change. Research over the past half-century has substantially increased the quantity and quality of information on the evolution of early complex societies. Collective Action in the Formation of Pre-Modern States
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |